3D comparison › Cameras compared

Ricoh GR IIIx vs Nikon Zf

The Nikon Zf is 34.6 mm wider, 41.1 mm taller, 13.8 mm deeper and 448 g heavier than the Ricoh GR IIIx. The Ricoh GR IIIx takes up 67 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size

In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.

Open the 3D comparison →

Ricoh GR IIIx

Width × height × depth: 109.4 × 61.9 × 35.2 mm (4.31 × 2.44 × 1.39 in)
Weight: 262 g (9.2 oz)
Mount: Fixed lens
Price: no recent price

B&H Photo ↗Amazon ↗Adorama ↗

All about the GR IIIx →

Nikon Zf

Width × height × depth: 144 × 103 × 49 mm (5.67 × 4.06 × 1.93 in)
Weight: 710 g (25.0 oz)
Mount: Nikon Z
Price: no recent price

B&H Photo ↗Amazon ↗Adorama ↗

All about the Zf →

Specifications compared

	GR IIIx	Zf
Sensor	APS-C CMOS (23.5 x 15.6 mm)	Full-Frame
Resolution	24 MP	24.5 MP
Lens	40mm F2.8 (35mm equivalent), built in	–
Dimensions	109.4 x 61.9 x 35.2 mm	144 x 103 x 49 mm
Weight	262 g	710 g with battery & card
Stabilization	3-axis in-body, up to 4 stops	Sensor-Shift
ISO	100–102400	Photo
Shutter speed	1/4000–30 s	1/8000–30 s
Video	1080p 60p	4K internal
Autofocus	Hybrid PDAF/contrast AF, face/eye detection	273-point hybrid AF, subject detection
Viewfinder	None (optional optical viewfinder)	Electronic (OLED) · 3,690,000 Dot · 0.8x
Screen	3.0" 1.04M-dot fixed touch	Articulating 3.2" Touchscreen LCD
Card slots	Internal 2 GB, 1x SD UHS-I	SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) · microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC (UHS-I)
Battery	DB-110, about 200 shots (CIPA)	EN-EL15c
Burst	–	Up to 14 fps