MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

OM-1 vs Hasselblad X2D 100C

The Hasselblad X2D 100C is 13.7 mm wider, 14.4 mm taller, 1.8 mm deeper and 296 g heavier than the OM-1. The OM-1 takes up 23 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

OM-1

OM-1
Width × height × depth
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm (5.31 × 3.61 × 2.86 in)
Weight
599 g (21.1 oz)
Mount
Micro Four Thirds
Price
no recent price

All about the OM-1 →

Hasselblad X2D 100C

Hasselblad X2D 100C
Width × height × depth
148.5 × 106 × 74.5 mm (5.85 × 4.17 × 2.93 in)
Weight
895 g (31.6 oz)
Mount
Hasselblad X
Price
$5,739 at B&H Photo

All about the Hasselblad X2D 100C →

Specifications compared

OM-1Hasselblad X2D 100C
SensorFour Thirds (17.4 x 13.0 mm) stacked BSI Live MOS100 MP medium format (43.8 x 32.9 mm)
Resolution20.4 MP100 MP
Stabilization5-axis in-body, up to 8 EV steps5-axis in-body, up to 7 stops
ISO200–102400 (default auto 200–25600; LOW approx. 80)64–25600
Burst120 fps electronic (S-AF, blackout-free), 50 fps C-AF3.3 fps
Video4K 60p 10-bit 4:2:0; Full HD 240pNone
Autofocus1,053-point cross-type phase detection AF, contrast AF (1,053 points)Hybrid PDAF/contrast AF, 294 zones
ViewfinderOLED EVF, 5.76M dots, approx. 1.48x–1.65x, 100% coverage5.76M-dot OLED, 1.0x
Screen76 mm (3.0") vari-angle touch, approx. 1.62M dots3.6" 2.36M-dot tilting touch
Card slots2x SD UHS-IIInternal 1 TB SSD, 1x CFexpress B
BatteryBLX-1 rechargeable (included)Li-ion 3400 mAh, about 420 shots (CIPA)
Size (W x H x D)–148.5 x 106 x 74.5 mm
Weight–895 g (with battery)
Dimensions–148.5 x 106 x 74.5 mm
Shutter speed–1/4000–68 min (electronic 1/6000)

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the OM-1 Follow the Hasselblad X2D 100C

More comparisons